Well good news, we still have a few seats left for the beginner and intermediate photography workshops coming up in 2 weeks! Come learn how to use those fancy new cameras or lenses you may have bought or received over the holidays. Workshops are hosted by Kimberly Jarman and Jennifer Bowen, co-owners of Create Better Images® Photography Workshops

BEGINNER PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP

What you will learn:
The fundamentals of photography including ISO, aperture and shutter speed
How to apply these fundamentals to the process of shooting your camera manually
Equipment & lens tips: which lenses give you the most bang for your buck
How to turn off your flash and get better results
How to work with natural light for better photos, and where to find it.
How to take more creative photos
Post-processing ideas to make your images really pop
Time for hands-on practice and Q&A

When:
Thursday, January 20, 2011
6:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Registration begins at 5:30 PM

Where:
Create Better Images Headquarters
hosted in the Kimberly Jarman Photography Studio
126 W. Main St. Mesa, AZ 85201

Cost:
$189

How to Register:
Click this link to sign up!

***********************

INTERMEDIATE PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP

What you will learn:
How to shoot manually and nail your exposure
Several tips for lighting, creative composition, and posing
How to work with subjects (clients!) before, during and after the shoot
How to speed up your digital workflow and post-process more efficiently
Tips to make your images really pop
How to work with off camera flash
And much more!

Plus we will put all of this know-how to work with a 2 hour LIVE MODEL SHOOT!
After the live model shoot, you will have the opportunity to process your images via Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop with Jennifer and Kim and then share them with the class. Both will offer hand-on guidance, and share useful tips for working with these programs. Lastly, we’ll have open Q&A time!

When:
Saturday, January 22, 2011
1:00 PM – 8:00 PM
Registration begins at 12:30 PM

Where:
Create Better Images Headquarters
hosted in the Kimberly Jarman Photography Studio
126 W. Main St. Mesa, AZ 85201

Cost:
$379

How to Register:
Click this link to sign up!

Wanna see Kim and Jennifer in action and hear more from attendees? Watch this fun video put together by Serendipty Videography.

Intern will provide assistance at portrait shoots and weddings with bags, lighting, holding gear and more. Occasional second-shooting opportunities may be possible eventually. Some knowledge of photography is necessary, however I will train you over time on shooting manually, using correct settings for the light, setting up off-camera flash, etc.

If you have any video editing software experience, that is a BIG plus.

Must Haves:

• Responsible, dependable and reliable (you show up when you say you will and on time)
• Motivated to learn and grow skills as a photographer
• General knowledge of fundamentals of photography
• Willing to work hard and do what is needed at weddings and shoots
• Schedule that allow you to work evenings and weekends
• Reliable transportation
• Computer skills (you know how to navigate computer files systems, use general software
• Sense of humor and positive disposition :-)

Skills or Experience that are a big plus:

• Knowledge of Lightroom and/or Photoshop
• Video editing software knowledge (can be as basic as a program such as iMovie on Mac)
• Experience with 5D Mark II video capabilities of similar HD camera

This intern position is initially not paid, however it could grow into a paid position within 6 months depending on performance. However, you will gain knowledge and experience about working at weddings and on photo shoots, working with clients, shooting manually and much more.

Interested applicants can email me here. Please include your skills level of the above and any other information you think would be relevant. I may not be able to respond right away to everyone, but I will get back with qualified individuals to set up a time to meet. Thank you!

I wanted to share my thoughts on the new Canon EOS 1D Mark IV. I recently purchased it, but almost feel it was out of necessity, rather than a purely desired purchase. Let me explain.

I have always been a Canon shooter. But as some of my photographer friends know, this past year I have contemplated moving to Nikon. I’m not one of those who has loved the 5D Mark II because I’ve had some issues with mine, specifically  the focus system. After many frustrations this past year shooting with the Mark II (and the focus system already being replaced once by Canon) I’ve put my faith in them that this new 1D Mark IV, with its brand-spanking-new 45-point focusing system, will respond consistently well and be a suitable replacement for my Mark II.

Let me give you a little background as to the equipment I’ve used and my progression through different bodies so it has some context. When I first started in photography about 10 years ago, purely as a hobby then, I learned with film. I bought a Canon Rebel film body, an entry level lens or two, and basically shot it on automatic until I started to learn a little more about shooting manually. Digital SLR cameras really starting taking off shortly after that, and being one who was never intimated by technology, I made that jump pretty early on. I bought the newest “entry level” digital SLR body at the time (Canon Rebel), a better lens, and my relationship with Canon digital SLR’s began…

That first Rebel camera worked well for me until I started shooting weddings and quickly realized I needed something that responded much faster and was more ergonomically laid out control-wise. I bought the newly released Canon 20D and found it worked great for the next year, and when the Canon 30D came out, I bought that one and sold the old Rebel. I shot with those two cameras for about a year until I could afford to buy the lovely full-frame Canon EOS 5D. And I fell in love instantly. Moving from a cropped sensor, like all the previous models were, into a full frame quite frankly took my photography to another level. The colors popped more, and the images out of the camera were just seemed to have more depth and dimension.  Not to mention my lenses, by this time mostly pro “L” series lenses worked as they should, meaning I had the full focal distance out of them. I knew that since I had gone to a full-frame sensor, I could never go back. I sold the old 20D and used the 30D as my primary backup, but mostly shot with that 5D for the next 2 1/2 years.

But like all things do, that camera aged with time and the technology had by then outpaced the current features. Like many other photographers out there, I was itching for Canon for release its successor since it had been 3 years since they rolled out a replacement full frame. I followed many of the technical blogs out there, checked in with Canon and other technology sites and forums, and waited impatiently for the replacement. Finally they announced it – the 5D Mark II! – and I quickly added my name to the waiting list at Samy’s, B&H and Crutchfield for the thing. It finally arrived right before Christmas 2008, and I felt like I did the year I got the Cabbage Patch Kid doll from Santa. I was so excited to get my new toy and play with the features and functions, see how high I could push the ISO, and use the movie function to record home videos of Jordan on Christmas morning and of her seeing her new baby brother for the first time a month later.  (Ironically — and quite sadly for me — I accidentally reformatted the CF card of Jordan seeing Alex for the first time in the hospital before I pulled off the video. I pulled all the images but forgot to move the video over since those files were newer to me. Big, big bummer.)

So since that time, I’ve been shooting weddings with the Mark II and the original 5D. There are many things that I do like/love about the 5D Mark II, namely the high ISO and the ability to shoot rather cleanly in very dark scenes with no flash, the larger LCD screen, some of the new functions and  generally the feel of it my hands. I also obviously love the HD video capability for personal use and ergonomically, I find it’s a little ‘sturdier’ than the old 5D. And while the huge jump in megapixles was nice (if they are needed, say for shooting the cover of a magazine) I found I usually shot in SRAW 1 so that the files were 10-11 megapixels and not 21. Mainly because a 10 mpx RAW file produces a beautiful image, and working with those massive 21 mpx files requires an inordinate amount of space, both on CF cards and on the computer hard drive and virtual memory.

But what I did not like is that I noticed pretty quickly that this camera’s focusing system was extremely inconsistent. It had a difficult time locking in on a subject in low light conditions, such as receptions or darker ceremony spots, and would often “hunt” for too long, even with very fast prime lenses and all “L” series professional ones. What good is that high ISO for low lighting if the camera can’t focus on anything when you need it to? Many images came out very soft or slightly off focus. My Mark II also had a hard time locking focus in conditions that it should not have – such as high contrast or perfect outdoor light. On several occasions it would hunt between the groom’s tux and the bride’s dress and never focus lock on anything – as if it didn’t know if it should lock on black or white. Many times at weddings this past year, I had to flip my lens to manual focus and just override the whole system so I didn’t miss moments. And for someone who does not have 20/20 vision, that can be a little risky at times. But I usually did better than the AF system did! (Side note: I have used the “back-focus” button approach for a few years now; where you can lock in on your subject with the center focal point and then reposition the camera as needed by switching the functions between your exposure lock button on the back with the shutter button. This always worked brilliantly with the first 5D, but my Mark II would lose its focus on the recomposition half the time. It’s like the thing was on crack and so happy to keep bouncing around every second.  So, I sent it back to Canon and they replaced the entire AF system, saying it did have some malfunction issues. It came back better, but still did not focus as consistently well as my older 5D focuses.)

This past year, I had to increase the number of shots I take at any given portrait session or wedding just so that *something* came out in tack-sharp focus. I could take 3 shots of the same scene where I have changed absolutely nothing focus-lock wise and 2 would be SO soft and blurry and one tack-sharp. As a wedding photographer paid to capture moments, I cannot afford to miss any moments due to a poor internal focus system that is so inconsistent. After a little googling of “focus issues with the 5D Mark II”, I found LOTS of people were having the same issue I was. Turns out there are several blogs and forums burning up with less-than-kind-words for Canon, and specifically this camera and the focus system they should have updated when they released this camera. I wont share those links here only because my intention with this post is certainly not to bash Canon, and you can easily google the issues. As I said earlier, I have always been a Canon shooter, and my goal is to stick with them, because I think by and large they do make great products.

Which brings me back to hinging my relationship on this new 1D Mark IV. When Canon announced it, and the completely redesigned new 45-point focus system, I took a very hard look. I read as many things as I could about the camera, but I was afraid to spend that kind of money on a relatively untested body since I’d had so many problems the last time. And Canon definitely keeps things under wraps as far as all their selected-photographer-testers go; meaning those testers are not allowed to even look at their images on a computer or post them online; they can only view what’s on the LCD, which as we all know can sometimes look perfect there but when you open it up in the computer, sharpness can be off. (Which begs the question: why so much secrecy Canon? From what I understand, Nikon does not have this same approach with their testers.)

But what sealed the deal for me on deciding to move forward with this camera was this review by England-based photographer Jeff Ascough.  It wasn’t so much the {great} images that he did post from the wedding taken with this camera, it was that like me, his big hesitation was the fact that this was not a full-frame camera and therefore, its hard to imagine the files could be as pretty as the files that come out of the full frame Mark II. But as he put it after looking at them – the Mark IV blew the Mark II out of the water quality wise and he loved the focus system. Okay, done.

I will say, so far I am loving this camera. The focus system is much better, hands down. It doesn’t not have a problem locking in really low light, low contrast light or even nearly dark rooms. The files straight out of the camera are beautiful. It is a new body and system for me, since the 1 series cameras are a little different button wise than the 5D’s, and that is taking a little getting used to, but it has a ton of custom functions that the Mark II does not have. I also love that it has a dual card slot. It takes a CF card and a SD card. Battery life remains to be seen as far as shooting a wedding and if it will last all day. (Addendum: The battery does last all day.)

I did a comparison shoot the other day, where I set the two cameras on the exact same settings and took the same image to compare the output. In all cases, the Mark IV focused faster and quieter. I too thought I would notice the fact that it was a cropped sensor more than I am. When you compare the files with the Mark II, you do certainly see the crop, but when its up to your eye, Im not noticing it too much. Im a fairly “intimate” wedding shooter anyway, meaning I like to get up close to capture emotion, so I think this balanced with the full frame Mark II, will work beautifully for 2010 weddings. I can’t wait to put it to use starting March 6 with my first wedding back.

These images are of nothing special; I just wanted to show the color fidelity and quality of RAW images straight out of the camera for comparison sake. Nothing has been done to these except for converting them to JPEG via Adobe Lightroom. All images were taken with the exact same settings: same lens, aperture, and ISO. The shutter speed did vary a little since the sensors are different size. I’ve noted the settings below.

(I would have taken face & eyes shots of Jordan if I could have convinced to her sit still for more than 5 minutes for this, but alas, my almost 5-year-old had more important things to do, like climb the tree. And my client sessions of late have been little kids so its impossible to do a ‘test shoot” on toddlers – so instead you get kids toys! ;-)

This is the Canon 5D Mark II image (ISO 400, 24-70mm f/2.8L lens, shot at f/2.8, 1/2500 second). Used center focal point on the mouse and recomposed. Partially cloudy day; overcast at time of shot.

And the Canon 1D Mark IV image. (ISO 400, 24-70mm f/2.8L lens, shot at f/2.8, 1/4000 second). Same lighting conditions as above. Same focus approach; appears more in focus to me overall.

Canon 5D Mark II image (ISO 400, 24-70mm f/2.8L lens, shot at f/2.8, 1/6400 second)

Canon 1D Mark IV image. (ISO 400, 24-70mm f/2.8L lens, shot at f/2.8, 1/6400 second). This image would be brighter like above if I had backed up a bit, but I wanted to show the crop factor by staying in same place.

Canon 5D Mark II image (ISO 100, 50mm f/1.2 L lens, shot at f/2.0 @ 1/200 second)

Canon 1D Mark IV image (ISO 100, 50mm f/1.2 L lens, shot at f/2.0 @ 1/250 second). Again, appears to capture more detail.

Finally, here are the cameras side by side. My 5DMKII has the battery grip on it, which is nice at weddings because I never need to change the battery. The battery in the IDMKIV is bigger and different, so the “battery grip” is already part of the camera. I’m interested to know if it will last the entire day. Between the two cameras I’ll never run out of juice (and I always carry backup batteries even if I did), but it will be interesting to see how they perform side by side at the weddings this year.

5DMKII on the left. I will say I do like all the main buttons (menu, trash, review) to the left of the LCD like on the 5D, but I am getting used to the other body. Camera/live view function makes much more sense on the 5D also. Not sure why they named it “fel” on the 1D and put it on the front, right by the shutter button.

If you are one of those photographers who has had issues with your 5DMarkII, I’d love to know — or even if you haven’t and want to share your experience with it, please do! I have read some “rumors” that suggest Canon will issue a replacement for the 5D Mark II at some point in the next year or so – with the new focus system – and ideally I would have like to have waited, but in case it takes another year to come out, I didn’t want to wait that long. I also debated buying another original model 5D since I know a few places are still selling them, but after getting so used to the high ISO and bigger LCD, I didn’t know if I could go back to the other model ;-).

Anyway, hope this post helps if anyone else is on the fence about buying this new camera.

I find I only use about 10% of the entire Kubota set because I have found my favorites over the years and how I like to process images, but I think I’ll add this look to the mix for select photos. Especially ones like this…

Photogs: for more information on actions you can purchase, and in some cases download and try a few free ones, check out www.gettotallyrad.com or www.kubotaimagetools.com

If you are new to the blog, Kim and I co-host photography workshops designed for both novice photographers (or parents who simply want to take better pictures of their kids), as well as a more intermediate-advanced workshop designed for photographers of all levels: those who are pretty new to the game, those who have been photographing awhile but might need a different perspective, or advanced hobbyists who want to take their skills to the next level.

Our Create Better Images Beginner class teaches the basic fundamentals of photography: how to take your digital SLR camera off the automatic setting and apply the basics of aperture, shutter speed and ISO to your picture taking to create better or more creative images.We also explain what makes a great portrait, where to find flattering light & how to use it more effectively, how to turn off the little pop-up flash, what lenses you can purchase today to immediately make a difference in your photography, how to adjust your manual settings on your camera as well as share some secrets to making your images pop more. The 3-hour class covers a lot of info, so we know it can be a little overwhelming at first, but most attendees email us after to say they learned SO much and have already begun producing better images.

Here are a couple images from our beginner class two weeks ago:

Our Create Better Images Intermediate class takes the lessons to the next level, and incorporates a live model shoot as part of the learning experience. We go more in-depth with the camera’s manual settings, manipulating the light, posing suggestions and working with clients, using off-camera flash, and working with post processing software in an efficient manner to produce quick and stunning results to add the final touch to your images. The live shoot provides the hands-on learning experience where we walk around to find the light and photograph the models. This is where the attendees have the opportunity to apply the class lessons to the actions of working with light and people with hands-on guidance.

We had two models (well, technically 3 models) for this live shoot. Our first was Cheyenne, an actual high-school senior (I wish I looked like this in high school!):

We also had a couple that modeled as a bride and groom for us. They were married 6 years ago here in Arizona, hired a photographer for their wedding, viewed the images online only to find out a few weeks later he filed bankruptcy and shut his studio down. Sadly, he never delivered any final prints or provided any option for them to buy an album, prints or the images on disc. It baffles me how a person or any business could do that and not follow through on their end.  As you can imagine, they were pretty devastated that they never received any images from their wedding day. So when Tirsa emailed to express interest in serving as models, we didnt even have to blink. While its not their wedding day, she did wear the same dress, albiet slightly altered with the blush pink train she MADE and attached. Between 22 photographers, we knew we could give them some great images of them together. Here are some of my favs from those I captured that day:

Lastly, here is a group photo of our intermediate class. We meant to get one of the beginner class, but we got out a tad late and just didnt manage to get one with everyone. :-(

******************

If you are interested in attending our next round of Beginner or Intermediate Workshops, here is the general information:

WHAT: Beginner Photography Workshop / 25 seats total

WHEN: Thursday, May 13, 2010 / 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM

WHERE: 126 W. Main Street, Mesa Arizona

COST: $189 for the workshop ($159 early bird before February 9, 2010)
$89 non-refundable retainer holds your space; $100 balance due at the door.

HOW TO REGISTER: Click this link to register and to view all the class details

***************

WHAT: Intermediate Photography Workshop / 20 seats total

WHEN: Saturday, May 15, 2010 / 1:00 PM – 8:00 PM

WHERE: 126 W. Main Street, Mesa Arizona

COST: $379 for the workshop ($349 early bird before February 9th, 2010)
$179 non-refundable deposit holds your space; $200 balance due at the door.

HOW TO REGISTER: Click this link to register and to view all the class details

Hi,
I found your Blog and absolutly loved your photo’s. They are amazing!! Im only just starting out with photography. I was just wondering how do you get such amazing bright, crisp photo’s outside without the sun glaring on them? Is it a technique you use, the time of day…I have no idea. If you have any tips at all I would really appreciate to hear them.
Thanks so much,
Niki

Thanks Niki! In addition to understanding how the fundamentals of aperture, shutter speed and ISO interrelate (too much to go into here) and really understanding your own gear, I have found time of day plays one of the biggest roles in how your photographs turn out. You often hear photographers speak of “the sweet light” or “the golden light” which is that hour or so before the sun sets, when the light is low in the sky very golden. That is the time I try to schedule the majority of my outdoor sessions, or my time with the bride and groom for their “portrait time” on their wedding day. The least flattering time of day for outdoor photographs is when the sun is highest in the sky. This varies during the season and year, but generally speaking, from 10 AM-3 PM (in the AZ winter) and roughly 9 AM – 4 PM (in the AZ summer), when the high sun creates more harsh shadows and is very bright, causing your subjects to squint.

When the sun is too bright to place subjects in, my favorite outdoor light is 1) diffused light which is not necessarily the shade under a tree on a bright day, though sometimes this is a necessity, but places with overhangs, courtyards, patio coverings, or other more shaded areas because the light is soft and generally even:

a) Inside a courtyard, not in direct sun. Late afternoon/early evening.

b) On a patio, under the roof covering, facing out to light source.

and 2) golden light in the last 15-20 minutes of direct sun exposure before it sets.

This shot was taken in the last 10 minutes or so of light, facing sun at approx. 30 degree angle. Meaning sun was setting just a few degrees off to her left (my right).

The beauty of that last 20 min or so of daylight– when the sun is just above the horizon — is that it also provides some neat opportunities for backlighting, where you can incorporate the setting sun into your photos, or use the light to create pretty highlights in their hair or silhouette them.

Above:) Shot probably about 20-30 min before sun actually set over the horizon.

Below:) Shooting directly into last minutes of setting sun

Above:) Sun is right behind them, but I moved off the right a bit, so that it would not hit my lens directly. I wanted this shot to be very golden and “moody.” This was probably about 10 minutes before it went over the horizon.

If you are working with shaded areas in high sun, move your subjects to a place where the light falls off directly in front of them, or to the side of them. This gives you more exposure but keeps it diffused and not harsh. Think of your front doors open, and stepping just inside the door frame facing out, to the point where the sun leaves the face and body. To me, that is great light to shoot in, especially if the area behind your subject is dark and all the light falls off behind them.

Above:) She is standing in the door frame of her back patio door. I exposed for her skin, so that any ambient light coming from her house behind her would fall to dark. I intentionally underexposed the image by 1/2 stop or so she was my main focus. In post processing, I brought up the lights (her skin) a tiny bit and deepened the blacks (behind her) so again, the focus is on her belly and face, where my intention of the shot was to highlight.

Note: All of the above images were shot using manual settings so I have more control over the light in the final image.

And for the clearest, most crisp pictures in outdoor light, remember to keep your ISO as low as possible. I hope that helps!